[RuleML-all] RuleML 0.9 Release

[Bailo, John]

Yes, that is my concern exactly...writing my data in a standard markup.



The Flow Engine is a great thing: it allows the use of "rules" but fired in
a more deterministic way than an Inference Engine -- which works really well
for my application.



But if it could use the standard RuleML (assuming that RuleML will actually
be a standard) that would be the icing on the cake!







-----Original Message-----

From: David Dossot [mailto:david at dossot.net]

Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:50 AM

To: Bailo, John

Cc: 'David Z. Hirtle'; 'ruleml-all at ruleml.org'

Subject: Re: [RuleML-all] RuleML 0.9 Release



Hi John,



Nope, this will not affect the Flow Engine, this concerns only the

Inference Engine.



This said, I think that there might be a sublangage of RuleML that could

be applicable to the Flow Engine... I have to further investigate this:

I would much prefer to stick to a standard language instead of a

home-made one.



Regards,

David





Bailo, John wrote:



>Will that affect the use of the Flow Engine at all?

>

>

>

>I'm working on a project based on the Flow Engine and wonder if that will

>change they layout of Flow Engine rules.

>

>

>

>And as long as I have you on the phone, could I also ask: will the Flow

>Engine always use the NxBre format for rules, or will it ever allow use of

>the RuleML format (like the Inference Engine) -- or does that not make as

>much sense for the Flow Engine?

>






  _____  

<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed 6986 Spam messages and set aside 887
Newsletters for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  www.ellaforspam.com
<http://www.ellaforspam.com>