[RuleML-all] modeling the premisse A and B or C
David Dossot
david at dossot.net
Thu Jan 10 10:03:48 AST 2008
Hi Marco,
This is great news! Thank you.
I will let experts reply for Reaction RuleML, but as far as NxBRE is
concerned, the syntax must be the one defined by the Naf Datalog
sub-language of RuleML 0.9.
Here is an example of:
IF (A and B)
THEN
D
--> http://www.ruleml.org/0.9/exa/own_compact.ruleml
You can easily extrapolated to adding an Or (by nesting XML elements).
Hope this helps,
David
On Jan 9, 2008 7:54 PM, Marco Ensing <l.a.marco at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> Currently we are exporting to the Reaction RuleML format from the Rule
> Manager. This product is available for free from the website
> www.acumenbusiness.com. The trial period to create rules and export them
> to
> Reaction RuleML has been removed.
>
>
> I was wondering what we should generate for the construction
>
> IF (A and B) or C
> THEN
> D
>
>
>
> How would this be expressed in RuleML 0.9 release (for NxBRE) or Reaction
> Rules?
> Can this be expressed in one <Rule> or does this require to generate
> multiple rules?
>
> You feedback is appreciated (and in return you will get a product with
> your
> desired format)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Ensing
>
> _______________________________________________
> RuleML-all mailing list
> RuleML-all at ruleml.org
> http://mail.ruleml.org/mailman/listinfo/ruleml-all
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ruleml.org/pipermail/ruleml-all/attachments/20080110/3554ae9b/attachment.htm
More information about the RuleML-all
mailing list